arrow
Return

Fast evolving pair-instability supernova models: evolution, explosion, light curves

delete2016-10-06
delete64
delete
OA
AI
A
Alexandra Kozyreva *
M
Matthew Gilmer
R
Raphaël Hirschi
C
Carla Fröhlich
С
С. И. Блинников
R
Ryan Wollaeger
U
U. M. Noebauer
D
Daniel R. van Rossum
A
Alexander Heger
W
Wesley Even
R
Roni Waldman
A
Alexey Tolstov
E
E. Chatzopoulos
DOI:10.1093/mnras/stw2562delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
With an increasing number of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) discovered, the question of their origin remains open and causes heated debates in the supernova community. Currently, there are three proposed mechanisms for SLSNe: (1) pair-instability supernovae (PISNe), (2) magnetar-driven supernovae and (3) models in which the supernova ejecta interacts with a circumstellar material ejected before the explosion. Based on current observations of SLSNe, the PISN origin has been disfavoured for a number of reasons. Many PISN models provide overly broad light curves and too reddened spectra, because of massive ejecta and a high amount of nickel. In the current study, we re-examine PISN properties using progenitor models computed with the GENEC code. We calculate supernova explosions with FLASH and light-curve evolution with the radiation hydrodynamics code STELLA. We find that high-mass models (200 and 250 M-circle dot) at relatively high metallicity (Z = 0.001) do not retain hydrogen in the outer layers and produce relatively fast evolving PISNe Type I and might be suitable to explain some SLSNe. We also investigate uncertainties in light-curve modelling due to codes, opacities, the nickel-bubble effect and progenitor structure and composition.
Keywords:
radiative transfer
stars: evolution
stars: massive
supernovae: general
supernovae: individual: PTF12dam
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society cover
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IF:
4.8
Papers:
7.0W
Citations:
25.0W

Organization

M
Monash University
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 79
U
University of Tokyo
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 2.2K
K
Keele University
Scholars:
5.4K
Papers: 5.7K
Citations: 6.9K
U
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 58
U
university of chicago
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 80
L
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Scholars:
9.6K
Papers: 6.7K
Citations: 1.9W
H
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Scholars:
2.8W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 2.7W
M
Max Planck Society
Scholars:
8.2W
Papers: 7.7W
Citations: 3.3W
T
Tel Aviv University
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 3.6W
N
North Carolina State University
Scholars:
2.6W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 3.7W
researcher View more organizations