arrow
Return

Framework for syntactic string similarity measures

delete2019-09-01
delete36
PRE
AI
N
Najlah Gali *
R
Radu Mariescu-Istodor
P
Pasi Fränti
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.048delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Similarity measure is an essential component of information retrieval, document clustering, text summarization, and question answering, among others. In this paper, we introduce a general framework of syntactic similarity measures for matching short text. We thoroughly analyze the measures by dividing them into three components: character-level similarity, string segmentation, and matching technique. Soft variants of the measures are also introduced. With the help of two existing toolkits (SecondString and SimMetric), we provide an open-source Java toolkit of the proposed framework, which integrates the individual components together so that completely new combinations can be created. Experimental results reveal that the performance of the similarity measures depends on the type of the dataset. For well-maintained dataset, using a token-level measure is important but the basic (crisp) variant is usually enough. For uncontrolled dataset where typing errors are expected, the soft variants of the token-level measures are necessary. Among all tested measures, a soft token-level measure that combines set matching and q-grams at the character level perform best. A gap between human perception and syntactic measures still remains due to lacking semantic analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Similarity measure
String similarity
Information retrieval
Text processing
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Expert Systems with Applications cover
Expert Systems with Applications
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.9W
Citations:
10.2W

Organization

U
University of Eastern Finland
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 1.5W