.png){kind=icon}
Return
Genomic Selection Using Low-Density Marker Panels
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1534/genetics.108.100289.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Genomic selection (GS) using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is promising to improve response to selection in populations that are under artificial selection. High-density SNP genotyping of all selection candidates each generation, however, may not be cost effective. Smaller panels with SNPs that show strong associations with phenotype can be used, but this may require separate SNPs for each trait and each population. As an alternative, we propose to use a panel of evenly spaced low-density SNPs across the genome to estimate genome-assisted breeding values of selection candidates in pedigreed populations. The principle of this approach is to utilize cosegregation information from low-density SNPs to track effects of high-density SNP alleles within families. Simulations were used to analyze the loss of accuracy of estimated breeding values from using evenly spaced and selected SNP panels compared to using all high-density SNPs in a Bayesian analysis. Forward stepwise selection and a Bayesian approach were used to select SNPs. Loss of accuracy was nearly independent of the number of simulated quantitative trait loci (QTL) with evenly spaced SNPs, but increased with number of QTL For the selected SNP panels. Loss of accuracy with evenly spaced SNPs increased steadily over generations but was constant when the smaller number individuals that are selected for breeding each generation were also genotyped using the high-density SNP panel. With equal numbers of low-density SNPs, panels with SNPs selected on the basis of the Bayesian approach had the smallest loss in accuracy for a single trait, but a panel with evenly spaced SNPs at 10 cM was only slightly worse, whereas a panel with SNPs selected by forward stepwise selection was inferior. Panels with evenly spaced SNPs can, however, be used across traits and populations and their performance is independent of the number of QTL affecting the trait. and of the methods used to estimate effects in the training data and are, therefore, preferred for broad applications in pedigreed Populations under artificial selection.
Keywords:
LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM
ASSOCIATION
PREDICTION
Journal
IF:
5.1
Papers:
8.2K
Citations:
3.6W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveNovel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size.png)
GENOME RESEARCH
OAAI
GENOME RESEARCHIF5.5
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveA new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypesNATURE GENETICS
NATURE GENETICSIF31.8
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more