arrow
Return

Geochemistry and machine learning: methods and benchmarking

delete2025-02-18
delete0
delete
OA
AI
N
Nikolaos I. Prasianakis *
E
Eric Laloy
D
Diederik Jacques
J
J.C.L. Meeussen
G
G. D. Miron
D
Dmitrii A. Kulik
A
Andrés Idiart
E
Ersan Demirer
E
Emilie Coene
B
Benoît Cochepin
M
M. Leconte
M
Mary Savino
J
Javier Samper-Pilar
M
Marco De Lucia
S
Sergey V. Churakov
O
Olaf Kolditz
C
Changbing Yang
J
J. Samper
F
Francis Claret
DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-12066-3delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Thanks to the recent progress in numerical methods and computer technology, the application fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods (ML) are growing at a very fast pace. The field of geochemistry for nuclear waste management has recently started using ML for the acceleration of numerical simulations of reactive transport processes, for the improvement of multiscale and multiphysics couplings efficiency, and for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis. Several case studies indicate that the use of ML based approaches brings an overall acceleration of geochemical and reactive transport simulations between one and four orders of magnitude. This paper presents a benchmarking exercise that aims at providing a set of reference data and models for developing and applying ML techniques for geochemical and reactive transport simulations. Several well-known geochemical speciation codes are used to generate systematically a consistent set of high-quality chemical equilibrium data, to be used as input for the training of several ML methods. Two benchmarks are formulated, each with multiple levels of gradually increasing degree of complexity. The first benchmark focuses on cement chemistry, while the second one considers uranium sorption on a clay mineral. The performance of different ML techniques is then evaluated in terms of their numerical efficiency and accuracy. A speedup of several orders of magnitude is observed. The benefits and the limitations of different ML based techniques are then analysed and highlighted.
Keywords:
Machine learning
Geochemistry
Nuclear waste management
Numerical methods

Journal

Environmental Earth Sciences cover
Environmental Earth Sciences
IF:
2.8
Papers:
1.0K
Citations:
2.7W

Organization

A
amphos 21 consulting sl
Scholars:
11
Papers: 5
Citations: 0
H
Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam
Scholars:
18
Papers: 18
Citations: 2
U
ufz
Scholars:
46
Papers: 23
Citations: 3
U
Univ Bern
Scholars:
1.6K
Papers: 862
Citations: 348
U
University of A Coruna
Scholars:
251
Papers: 136
Citations: 36
A
Andra
Scholars:
24
Papers: 14
Citations: 3
S
sck cen
Scholars:
71
Papers: 36
Citations: 0
N
NRG
Scholars:
12
Papers: 4
Citations: 0
B
Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières
Scholars:
54
Papers: 27
Citations: 1.8K
researcher View more organizations