arrow
Return

GITHUB ACTIONS: The Impact on the Pull Request Process

delete2023-09-26
delete3
delete
OA
AI
M
Mairieli Wessel *
J
Joseph Vargovich
M
Marco Aurélio Gerosa
C
Christoph Treude
DOI:10.1007/s10664-023-10369-wdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Software projects frequently use automation tools to perform repetitive activities in the distributed software development process. Recently, GitHub introduced GitHub Actions, a feature providing automated workflows for software projects. Understanding and anticipating the effects of adopting such technology is important for planning and management. Our research investigates how projects use GitHub Actions, what the developers discuss about them, and how project activity indicators change after their adoption. Our results indicate that 1,489 out of 5,000 most popular repositories (almost 30% of our sample) adopt GitHub Actions and that developers frequently ask for help implementing them. Our findings also suggest that the adoption of GitHub Actions leads to more rejections of pull requests (PRs), more communication in accepted PRs and less communication in rejected PRs, fewer commits in accepted PRs and more commits in rejected PRs, and more time to accept a PR. We found similar results when segmenting our results by categories of GitHub Actions. We suggest practitioners consider these effects when adopting GitHub Actions on their projects.
Keywords:
GitHub actions
Bots
Automated workflow
Software repositories
Regression discontinuity design

Journal

Empirical Software Engineering cover
Empirical Software Engineering
IF:
3.6
Papers:
1.9K
Citations:
5.3K

Organization

N
Northern Arizona University
Scholars:
4.4K
Papers: 3.6K
Citations: 8.6K
R
Radboud University Nijmegen
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.4W
Citations: 5.4W
U
university of melbourne
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 69
researcher View more organizations