.png){kind=icon}
Return
Governing ghostbots
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105791.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This article discusses the legal implications of a novel phenomenon, namely, digital reincar-nations of deceased persons, sometimes known as post-mortem avatars, deepfakes, repli-cas, holographs, or chatbots. To elide these multiple names, we use the term 'ghostbots'. The piece is an early attempt to discuss the potential social and individual harms, roughly grouped around notions of privacy (including post-mortem privacy), property, personal data and reputation, arising from ghostbots, how they are regulated and whether they need to be adequately regulated further. For reasons of space and focus, the article does not deal with copyright implications, fraud, consumer protection, tort, product liability, and pornography laws, including the non-consensual use of intimate images (`revenge porn'). This paper fo-cuses on law, although we fully acknowledge and refer to the role of philosophy and ethics in this domain.We canvas two interesting legal developments with implications for ghostbots, namely, the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act and the 2021 New York law amending pub-licity rights to protect the rights of celebrities whose personality is used in post-mortem `replicas'. The latter especially evidences a remarkable shift from the norm we have chroni-cled in previous articles of no respect for post-mortem privacy to a growing recognition that personality rights do need protection post-mortem in a world where pop stars and actors are routinely re-created using AI. While the legislative motivation here may still be primar-ily to protect economic interests, we argue it also shows a concern for dignitary and privacy interests.Given the apparent concern for the appropriation of personality post-mortem, possibly in defiance or ignorance of what the deceased would have wished, we propose an early solution to regulate the rise of ghostbots, namely an enforceable `do not bot me' clause in analogue or digital wills.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Keywords:
Ghostbots
Deepfakes
Post-mortem privacy
Digital legacy
Digital remains
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.2
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
2.2K
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
No cited papers available