arrow
Return

Gradient Descent Provably Solves Nonlinear Tomographic Reconstruction

delete2026-05-01
delete0
PRE
AI
F
Fridovich-Keil, Sara *
V
Valdivia, Fabrizio
G
Gordon Wetzstein
B
Benjamin Recht
S
Soltanolkotabi, Mahdi
DOI:10.1109/tit.2026.3677729delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In computed tomography (CT), the forward model consists of a linear Radon transform followed by an exponential nonlinearity based on the attenuation of light according to the Beer-Lambert Law. Conventional reconstruction often involves inverting this nonlinearity and then solving a linear inverse problem. However, this nonlinear measurement preprocessing is poorly conditioned in the vicinity of high-density materials, such as metal. This preprocessing makes CT reconstruction methods numerically sensitive and susceptible to artifacts near high-density regions. In this paper, we study a technique where the signal is directly reconstructed from raw measurements through the nonlinear forward model. Though this optimization is nonconvex, we show that gradient descent provably converges to the global optimum at a geometric rate, perfectly reconstructing the underlying signal with a near minimal number of random measurements. We also prove similar results in the under-determined setting where the number of measurements is significantly smaller than the dimension of the signal. This is achieved by enforcing prior structural information about the signal through constraints on the optimization variables. We illustrate the benefits of direct nonlinear CT reconstruction with cone-beam CT experiments on synthetic and real 3D volumes, in which metal artifacts are reduced compared to standard linear reconstruction methods. Our experiments also demonstrate that logarithmic preprocessing alone is sufficient to produce metal artifacts, even in the absence of other causes such as beam hardening.
Keywords:
Computed tomography
Vectors
Metals
Noise measurement
Three-dimensional displays
Compressed sensing
Weight measurement
Standards
Mathematical models
Image reconstruction
reconstruction algorithms
gradient methods
compressed sensing

Journal

I
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IF:
2.9
Papers:
317
Citations:
0

Organization

G
georgia institute of technology
Scholars:
2.2K
Papers: 1.1K
Citations: 0
U
university system of georgia
Scholars:
7.3W
Papers: 6.6W
Citations: 101
U
university of california berkeley
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 811
Citations: 0
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.7W
Papers: 33.8W
Citations: 6.6K
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

NeAT: Neural Adaptive Tomography
err2022-07-22
err8
PREAI
errRueckert, Darius; Wang, Yuanhao; Li, Rui; Idoughi, Ramzi; Heidrich, Wolfgang
errShare
errSave
TIGRE: a MATLAB-GPU toolbox for CBCT image reconstruction
err2016-09-08
err0
errOAAI
errAnder Biguri; Manjit Dosanjh; Steven Hancock; Manuchehr Soleimani
errShare
errSave
THE LANDSCAPE OF EMPIRICAL RISK FOR NONCONVEX LOSSES
err2018-12-01
err180
errOAAI
errMei, Song; Bai, Yu; Montanari, Andrea
errShare
errSave
Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging
err
IF0
err2012-05-25
err0
PREAI
errAvinash C. Kak; Malcolm Slaney
errShare
errSave
The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography
err
IF0
err2012-05-25
err0
errOAAI
errF. Natterer
errShare
errSave
Photon counting computed tomography: Concept and initial results
err2005-01-21
err107
PREAI
errShikhaliev, PM; Xu, T; Molloi, S
errShare
errSave
Phase Retrieval via Wirtinger Flow: Theory and Algorithms
err2015-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errEmmanuel J. Candes; Xiaodong Li; Mahdi Soltanolkotabi
errShare
errSave
A Review of Deep Learning CT Reconstruction: Concepts, Limitations, and Promise in Clinical Practice
err2022-07-27
err0
errOAAI
errTimothy P. Szczykutowicz; Giuseppe V. Toia; Amar Dhanantwari; Brian Nett
errShare
errSave
Comparison Between Pre-Log and Post-Log Statistical Models in Ultra-Low-Dose CT Reconstruction
err2017-03-01
err0
errOAAI
errLin Fu; Tzu-Cheng Lee; Soo Mee Kim; Adam M. Alessio; Paul E. Kinahan; Zhiqian Chang; Ken Sauer; Mannudeep K. Kalra; Bruno De Man
errShare
errSave
researcher View more