arrow
Return

Gradient Leakage Attack Resilient Deep Learning

delete2022-01-01
delete36
delete
OA
AI
W
Wei, WQ *
Ling Liu cover
Ling Liu (Ling Liu)
DOI:10.1109/TIFS.2021.3139777delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Gradient leakage attacks are considered one of the wickedest privacy threats in deep learning as attackers covertly spy gradient updates during iterative training without compromising model training quality, and yet secretly reconstruct sensitive training data using leaked gradients with high attack success rate. Although deep learning with differential privacy is a defacto standard for publishing deep learning models with differential privacy guarantee, we show that differentially private algorithms with fixed privacy parameters are vulnerable against gradient leakage attacks. This paper investigates alternative approaches to gradient leakage resilient deep learning with differential privacy (DP). First, we analyze existing implementation of deep learning with differential privacy, which use fixed noise variance to injects constant noise to the gradients in all layers using fixed privacy parameters. Despite the DP guarantee provided, the method suffers from low accuracy and is vulnerable to gradient leakage attacks. Second, we present a gradient leakage resilient deep learning approach with differential privacy guarantee by using dynamic privacy parameters. Unlike fixed-parameter strategies that result in constant noise variance, different dynamic parameter strategies present alternative techniques to introduce adaptive noise variance and adaptive noise injection which are closely aligned to the trend of gradient updates during differentially private model training. Finally, we describe four complementary metrics to evaluate and compare alternative approaches. Extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets show that differentially private deep learning with dynamic privacy parameters outperforms the deep learning using fixed DP parameters, and existing adaptive clipping approaches in all aspects: compelling accuracy performance, strong differential privacy guarantee, and high attack resilience.
Keywords:
Deep learning
gradient leakage attack
differential privacy

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security cover
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
IF:
8
Papers:
5.3K
Citations:
2.3W

Organization

U
university system of georgia
Scholars:
7.3W
Papers: 6.6W
Citations: 101
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The relationship of monodentate and bidentate coordinated uranium(VI) sulfate in aqueous solution
err2009-09-25
err0
PREAI
errChristoph Hennig; A. Ikeda; K. Schmeide; Vinzenz Brendler; Henry Moll; S. Tsushima; A. C. Scheinost; Suntharalingam Skanthakumar; R. Wilson; L. Soderholm; K. Servaes; et al.
errShare
errSave
Parkinson's disease: Nigral receptor changes support peptidergic role in nigrostriatal modulation
err2004-10-08
err0
PREAI
errGeorge R. Uhl; Gail O. Hackney; Mary Torchia; Victoria Stranov; Wallace W. Tourtellotte; Peter J. Whitehouse; Vinh Tran; Steven Strittmatter
errShare
errSave
Osteoid osteoma of the ethmoid bone associated with dacryocystitis
err2006-08-04
err0
errOAAI
errVassilios A. Lachanas; Anastasios V. Koutsopoulos; Jiannis K. Hajiioannou; Argyto J. Bizaki; Emmanuel S. Helidonis; John G. Bizakis
errShare
errSave
When Does Model-Based Control Pay Off?
err2016-08-26
err0
errOAAI
errWouter Kool; Fiery A. Cushman; Samuel J. Gershman
errShare
errSave
Identification of Small Molecules that Disrupt Signaling between ABL and Its Positive Regulator RIN1
err2015-03-26
err0
errOAAI
errPamela Y. Ting; Robert Damoiseaux; Björn Titz; Kenneth A. Bradley; Thomas G. Graeber; Virneliz Fernández-Vega; Thomas D. Bannister; Peter Chase; Reji Nair; Louis Scampavia; Peter Hodder; Timothy P. Spicer; John Colicelli
errShare
errSave
researcher View more