logo
CanyamAI summaries for academic research
language
MobileMobile
  • Phone FeatureWeChat Mini Program
EnglishEnglish
noticeNotice
BlogBlog
delete
arrow
Return

Graphical representation in graphical dialodgue

delete2002-10-01
delete22
PRE
AI
P
Patrick G. T. Healey
N
Nik Swoboda
I
Ichiro Umata
Y
Yasuhiro Katagiri
DOI：10.1006/ijhc.2002.1022delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This paper explores the influence of communicative interaction on the form of graphical representations. A referential communication task is described which involves exclusively graphical dialogue. In this task subjects communicate about pieces of music by drawing. The drawings produced fall into two basic types: Abstract and Figurative. Three hypotheses are developed about the factors influencing the use of these drawing types: efficiency of production, suitability for the task and level of communicative interaction. Experimental evidence is presented which indicates that the drawing types do not differ in the amount of effort required to produce them. The results indicate that (1) Abstract drawings are more effective than Figurative drawings for comparative tasks and (2) a key constraint on their use is level of direct communicative interaction. It is argued that these observations result from differences in the underlying semantic models of music associated with the drawing types and the consequences these differences have for communicative coordination. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

I
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
IF:
5.1
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
8.9K

Organization

No organization information available