arrow
Return

Greedy Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack LSTMs

delete2017-06-01
delete8
delete
OA
AI
M
Miguel Ballesteros *
Y
Yoav Goldberg
N
Noah A. Smith
DOI:10.1162/COLI_a_00285delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We introduce a greedy transition-based parser that learns to represent parser states using recurrent neural networks. Our primary innovation that enables us to do this efficiently is a new control structure for sequential neural networksthe stack long short-term memory unit (LSTM). Like the conventional stack data structures used in transition-based parsers, elements can be pushed to or popped from the top of the stack in constant time, but, in addition, an LSTM maintains a continuous space embedding of the stack contents. Our model captures three facets of the parser's state: (i) unbounded look-ahead into the buffer of incoming words, (ii) the complete history of transition actions taken by the parser, and (iii) the complete contents of the stack of partially built tree fragments, including their internal structures. In addition, we compare two different word representations: (i) standard word vectors based on look-up tables and (ii) character-based models of words. Although standard word embedding models work well in all languages, the character-based models improve the handling of out-of-vocabulary words, particularly in morphologically rich languages. Finally, we discuss the use of dynamic oracles in training the parser. During training, dynamic oracles alternate between sampling parser states from the training data and from the model as it is being learned, making the model more robust to the kinds of errors that will be made at test time. Training our model with dynamic oracles yields a linear-time greedy parser with very competitive performance.
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Computational Linguistics cover
Computational Linguistics
IF:
5.3
Papers:
837
Citations:
2.7K

Organization

B
Bar Ilan University
Scholars:
9.7K
Papers: 8.5K
Citations: 59
U
University of Washington
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 7.0W
Citations: 12.5W
I
international business machines (ibm)
Scholars:
5.7K
Papers: 4.5K
Citations: 4
I
ibm usa
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 1.0K
Citations: 0
researcher View more organizations