.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
A
R
S
B
J
X
N
L
A
F
D
J
Q
L
P
C
D
S
H
Q
G
X
W
R
DOI：10.1002/prot.70035.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Model quality assessment (MQA) remains a critical component of structural bioinformatics for both structure predictors and experimentalists seeking to use predictions for downstream applications. In CASP16, the Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) category featured both global and local quality estimation for multimeric assemblies (QMODE1 and QMODE2), as well as a novel QMODE3 challenge—requiring predictors to identify the best five models from thousands generated by MassiveFold. This paper presents detailed results from several leading CASP16 EMA methods, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the approaches.
Keywords:
computational molecular biology
molecular models
protein conformation
protein domains
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
P
IF:
2.8
Papers:
6.6K
Citations:
1.4W
Organization
Cited Papers