Return
Holding vs. Using Power: A Dyadic Study of Mediated Power and Responsible Supply Chains
Y
B
J
J
DOI:10.1111/jscm.70027.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Business organizations must (re-)evaluate their supply chain practices to foster responsible relationships while adopting strategies to achieve sustainability. Understanding the dynamic interactions among supply chain members is essential for advancing responsible supply chain practices. The authors define responsible supply chain practices as those that support ethical, fair, and socially beneficial outcomes within buyer–supplier relationships, particularly when power asymmetries affect less powerful actors. Building on power-dependence theory within the broader framework of social exchange theory, this research explores how power dynamics influence supply chain interactions and drive the adoption of responsible supply chain practices. Drawing on empirical data from 17 dyadic interactions involving 12 Chinese manufacturers and their 17 supply chain partners, three key findings emerge. First, extending power-dependence theorizing in a responsible supply chain context, responsible outcomes are shaped by the interplay between dependence, the performative exertion of mediated power, and resistance from less powerful partners. Second, the research introduces a power-dynamics matrix that provides a structured framework to analyze the interplay between power/dependence (i.e., power-as-a-position) and power use (i.e., power-as-action) in advancing responsible supply chain management. Third, power's influence is analyzed at both intra-organizational and inter-organizational levels, providing an integrated perspective on social, relational, and ethical dimensions of responsible supply chains. These findings provide a better understanding of power dynamics in supply chains and offer actionable insights for promoting responsible practices within complex supply chain networks.
Keywords:
buyer-supplier relationships
power
responsible supply chains
sustainability
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
9.9
Papers:
435
Citations:
3.7K
