arrow
Return

Holographic complexity equals which action?

delete2019-02-25
delete92
delete
OA
AI
K
Kanato Goto *
H
Hugo Marrochio
M
Myers, Robert C.
Q
Queimada, Leonel
Y
Yoshida, Beni
DOI:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)160delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We revisit the complexity = action proposal for charged black holes. We investigate the complexity for a dyonic black hole, and we find the surprising feature that the late-time growth is sensitive to the ratio between electric and magnetic charges. In particular, the late-time growth rate vanishes when the black hole carries only a magnetic charge. If the dyonic black hole is perturbed by a light shock wave, a similar feature appears for the switchback effect, e.g. it is absent for purely magnetic black holes. We then show how the inclusion of a surface term to the action can put the electric and magnetic charges on an equal footing, or more generally change the value of the late-time growt rate. Next, we investigate how the causal structure influences the late-time growth with and without the surface term for charged black holes in a family of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton theories. Finally, we connect the previous discussion to the complexity=action proposal for the two-dimensional Jackiw-Teitelboim theory. Since the two-dimensional theory is obtained by a dimensional reduction from Einstein-Maxwell theory in higher dimensions in a near-extremal and near-horizon limit, the choices of parent action and parent background solution determine the behaviour of holographic complexity in two dimensions.
Keywords:
AdS-CFT Correspondence
Black Holes
Black Holes in String Theory
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of High Energy Physics cover
Journal of High Energy Physics
IF:
5.5
Papers:
3.9W
Citations:
13.7W

Organization

U
University of Tokyo
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 2.2K
P
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 1.6K
Citations: 5