.png){kind=icon}
Return
How to validate machine-learned interatomic potentials
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1063/5.0139611.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Machine learning (ML) approaches enable large-scale atomistic simulations with near-quantum-mechanical accuracy. With the growing availability of these methods, there arises a need for careful validation, particularly for physically agnostic models-that is, for potentials that extract the nature of atomic interactions from reference data. Here, we review the basic principles behind ML potentials and their validation for atomic-scale material modeling. We discuss the best practice in defining error metrics based on numerical performance, as well as physically guided validation. We give specific recommendations that we hope will be useful for the wider community, including those researchers who intend to use ML potentials for materials off the shelf.
Keywords:
BENCHMARKING
PERFORMANCE
UNCERTAINTY
GENERATION
CARBONS
Journal
IF:
3.1
Papers:
7.2W
Citations:
23.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveE(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials.png)
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
OAAI
NATURE COMMUNICATIONSIF15.7
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more