arrow
Return

Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects

delete2019-08-27
delete25
delete
OA
AI
E
Eduard Ort *
J
Johannes J. Fahrenfort
T
Tuomas ten Cate
M
Martin Eimer
C
Christian N. L. Olivers
DOI:10.7554/eLife.49130delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The human brain recurrently prioritizes task-relevant over task-irrelevant visual information. A central question is whether multiple objects can be prioritized simultaneously. To answer this, we let observers search for two colored targets among distractors. Crucially, we independently varied the number of target colors that observers anticipated, and the number of target colors actually used to distinguish the targets in the display. This enabled us to dissociate the preparation of selection mechanisms from the actual engagement of such mechanisms. Multivariate classification of electroencephalographic activity allowed us to track selection of each target separately across time. The results revealed only small neural and behavioral costs associated with preparing for selecting two objects, but substantial costs when engaging in selection. Further analyses suggest this cost is the consequence of neural competition resulting in limited parallel processing, rather than a serial bottleneck. The findings bridge diverging theoretical perspectives on capacity limitations of feature-based attention.
Keywords:
WORKING-MEMORY
SINGLE-COLOR
ATTENTIONAL TEMPLATES
NEURAL MECHANISMS
GLOBAL WORKSPACE
TARGET SELECTION
SEARCH
GUIDANCE
MODEL
COMPETITION

Journal

eLife cover
eLife
IF:
0
Papers:
1.8W
Citations:
16

Organization

V
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Scholars:
4.2W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 3.7W
B
Birkbeck University London
Scholars:
1.8K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 11
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305
researcher View more organizations