.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Hybrid Monitoring Framework for Geological CO2 Storage: Comparative Insights from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Conventional Techniques
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
Z
M
O
M
M
R
A
DOI：10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100561.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• Comparative review of NMR and conventional CO₂ storage monitoring techniques. • NMR reveals pore-scale CO₂ trapping, wettability, and fluid dynamics processes. • Conventional methods capture large-scale plume movement but lack pore resolution. • Hybrid NMR–geophysical monitoring improves accuracy and leakage detection. • Machine learning integration enhances predictive capability and uncertainty control.
Keywords:
CO2 geological storage
geophysical tools
NMR
integrated monitoring tools
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
C
IF:
10.5
Papers:
492
Citations:
1.9K
Organization
Cited Papers