.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Hyperspectral Band Selection With Iterative Graph Autoencoder
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TGRS.2023.3273776.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Hyperspectral band selection (BS) is an important task for hyperspectral image (HSI) processing, which aims to select a discriminative and low-redundant band subset. As a significant cue for BS, structure information describes the cross-band correlation, which brings the redundancy of HSI. Existing methods model structure information via manual rule-based graph construction. However, such a graph construction method fails to model complex and diverse structural relationships of HSI data. To address this problem, we propose a data-driven method, named iterative graph autoencoder for BS (IGAEBS). It adaptively captures structure information by a data-specific automatic construction process, rather than by a fixed empirical design. Specifically, we propose a new unsupervised pretext task to train graph convolution neural networks to extract HSI features. These features are used to construct a graph to represent the structural relationships among bands. To enhance the reliability of the graph, we further design an iterative graph improvement mechanism to progressively refine the structure representation. Using the derived graph, we partition the bands into several clusters and select a representative band from each cluster. During the selection process, both intracluster information and intercluster information are considered to improve the discriminativeness of band subset. Extensive experiments are conducted on three public datasets to validate the superiority of the proposed method compared to other state-of-the-art methods.
Keywords:
Feature extraction
Iterative methods
Symmetric matrices
Hyperspectral imaging
Convolution
Correlation
Task analysis
Graph autoencoder (GAE)
graph representation
hyperspectral band selection (BS)
representativeness
Journal
IF:
8.6
Papers:
2.1W
Citations:
10.7W