arrow
Return

Impact and correction of segmentation errors in spatial transcriptomics

delete2026-01-20
delete0
PRE
AI
J
Jonathan Mitchel
T
Teng Gao
V
Viktor Petukhov
E
Eli Cole
P
Peter V. Kharchenko *
DOI:10.1038/s41588-025-02497-4delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Spatial transcriptomics aims to elucidate how cells coordinate within tissues by connecting cellular states to their native microenvironments. Imaging-based assays are especially promising, capturing molecular and cellular features at subcellular resolution in three dimensions. Interpretation of such data, however, hinges on accurate cell segmentation. Assigning individual molecules to the correct cells remains challenging. Here we re-analyze data from multiple tissues and platforms to find that segmentation errors currently confound most downstream analysis of cellular state, including differential expression, neighbor influence and ligand–receptor interactions. The extent to which misassigned molecules impact the results can be striking, frequently dominating the results. Thus, we show that matrix factorization of local molecular neighborhoods can effectively identify and isolate such molecular admixtures, thereby reducing their impact on downstream analyses, in a manner analogous to doublet filtering in single-cell RNA sequencing. As the applications of spatial transcriptomics assays become more widespread, accounting for segmentation errors will be important for resolving molecular mechanisms of tissue biology. This study finds that cell segmentation errors affect numerous downstream applications of spatial transcriptomics data and provides a method to correct these errors by factorizing molecular neighborhoods.
Keywords:
segmentation errors
spatial transcriptomics
molecular neighborhoods
matrix factorization
downstream analysis

Journal

Nature Genetics cover
Nature Genetics
IF:
29
Papers:
692
Citations:
241

Organization

A
Altos Labs
Scholars:
130
Papers: 41
Citations: 532
H
Harvard Medical School
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 91