Return
Impact of flow and human behaviour on airborne disease transmission
F
J
Z
C
S
M
H
C
W
H
DOI:10.1007/s12273-026-1448-6.png)
Abstract
En 中文
The risk of indoor airborne transmission among co-located individuals is generally non-uniform, which remains a critical challenge for public health modelling. Thus, we present CompARE, an integrated risk assessment framework for indoor airborne disease transmission that reveals a striking bimodal distribution of infection risk driven by airflow dynamics and human behaviour. Combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD), machine learning (ML), and agent-based modelling (ABM), our model captures the complex interplay between aerosol transport, human mobility, and environmental context. Based on a prototypical childcare centre, our approach quantifies how incorporation of ABM can unveil significantly different infection risk profiles across agents, with a more than two-fold change in risk of infection between the individuals with the lowest and highest risks in more than 90% of cases, despite all individuals being in the same overall environment. We found that infection risk distributions can exhibit not only a striking bimodal pattern in certain activities but also exponential decay and fat-tailed behaviour in others. Specifically, we identify low-risk modes (<0.1% probability) arising from source containment, as well as high-risk tails (10× higher risk at >1% probability) from prolonged close contact during mobile activities. Our approach enables near-real-time scenario analysis and provides policy-relevant quantitative insights into how ventilation design, spatial layout, and social distancing policies can mitigate transmission risk. These findings challenge simple distance-based heuristics and support the design of targeted, evidence-based interventions in high-occupancy indoor settings.
Keywords:
airborne respiratory disease transmission
Wells-Riley infection model
computational fluid dynamics
agent-based modelling
coupled CFD-ABM
machine learning surrogate
Journal
IF:
5.9
Papers:
1.5K
Citations:
4.5K
