.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Implementing Dignity-Centered Mental Health Care: Lessons from International Policy Frameworks
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3390/healthcare14070911.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
International policy frameworks, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and the WHO Quality Rights initiative, have established dignity as a foundational right in mental health care. However, a significant gap remains between these policy aspirations and the lived experience of service users, often due to risk-averse cultures that prioritize control over autonomy. This commentary employs an interpretive synthesis of international literature (2006-2025) and illustrative case examples, such as the Trieste model and Quality Rights implementation in low-resource settings, to examine the operationalization of dignity-centered care. I argue for a paradigm shift from control-based safety models to relational safety grounded in biographical literacy and positive risk-taking. Key findings highlight that dignity-centered approaches not only improve patient experiences of respect and agency but also mitigate moral injury and burnout among the nursing workforce. Furthermore, as digital mental health tools and AI-driven risk assessments emerge, systems must ensure these technologies enhance rather than automate paternalism. I conclude that realizing dignity-centered care requires a structural and cultural transformation, embedding dignity into clinical protocols, leadership practices, and environmental design to move beyond rhetorical commitments toward measurable, humane standards.
Keywords:
mental health policy
human rights
dignity-centered care
nursing leadership
UNCRPD
patient safety
positive risk-taking
relational security
quality rights
Journal
IF:
2.7
Papers:
2.0K
Citations:
2.5W
Organization
Cited Papers