Return
Implementing errors on errors: Bayesian vs frequentist
DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14638-4.png)
Abstract
En 中文
When combining apparently inconsistentexperimental results, one often implements errors on errors. The Particle Data Group’s phenomenological prescription offers a practical solution but lacks a firm theoretical foundation. To address this, D’Agostini and Cowan have proposed Bayesian and frequentist approaches, respectively, both introducing gamma-distributed auxiliary variables to model uncertainty in quoted errors. In this Letter, we show that these two formulations admit a parameter-by-parameter correspondence, and are structurally equivalent. This identification clarifies how Bayesian prior choices can be interpreted in terms of frequentist sampling assumptions, providing a unified probabilistic framework for modeling uncertainty in quoted variances.
Journal
IF:
4.8
Papers:
1.9W
Citations:
4.7W
Organization
Cited Papers
no more

