arrow
Return

Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively:: cluster randomized trial

delete2008-07-09
delete66
PRE
AI
M
Maria Müller‐Staub *
M
Matthias Odenbreit
M
Mary Ann Lavin
T
Theo van Achterberg
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04700.xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to investigate the effect of guided clinical reasoning. This method was chosen as a follow-up educational measure (refresher) after initial implementation of standardized language. Background. Research has demonstrated nurses' need for education in diagnostic reasoning to state and document accurate nursing diagnoses, and to choose effective nursing interventions to attain favourable patient outcomes. Methods. In a cluster randomized controlled experimental study, nurses from three wards received guided clinical reasoning, an interactive learning method. Three wards, receiving classic case discussions, functioned as control group. Data were collected in 2004-2005. The quality of 225 randomly selected nursing records, containing 444 documented nursing diagnoses, corresponding interventions and outcomes was evaluated by applying 18 Likert-type items with a 0-4 scale of the instrument Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes. The effect of guided clinical reasoning was tested against classic case discussions using T-tests and mixed effects model analyses. Findings. The mean scores for nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes increased significantly in the intervention group. Guided clinical reasoning led to higher quality of nursing diagnosis documentation; to aetiology-specific interventions and to enhanced nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. In the control group, the quality was unchanged. Conclusion. Guided clinical reasoning supported nurses' abilities to state accurate nursing diagnoses, to select effective nursing interventions and to reach and document favourable patient outcomes. The results support the use of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcomes Classification classifications and demonstrate implications for the electronic nursing documentation.
Keywords:
cluster randomized experimental design
documentation
evaluation
health record
interventions
nursing diagnoses
outcomes
Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO)
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Advanced Nursing cover
Journal of Advanced Nursing
IF:
3.4
Papers:
1.4W
Citations:
2.6W

Organization

S
Saint Louis University
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 8.7K
Citations: 151
R
Radboud University Nijmegen
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.4W
Citations: 5.4W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
ABO and H Blood Group System
err2019-01-01
err0
PREAI
errLynsi Rahorst; Connie M. Westhoff
errShare
errSave
Exploring teachers' knowledge of children's literature
err2008-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errTeresa Cremin; Marilyn Mottram; Eve Bearne; Prue Goodwin
errShare
errSave
Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes -: application and impact on nursing practice:: systematic review
err2006-10-31
err132
errOAAI
errMueller-Staub, Maria; Lavin, Mary Ann; Needham, Ian; van Achterberg, Theo
errShare
errSave
Chemistry of thienopyridines. IX. Direct nitration of thieno[2,3‐b]pyridine and thieno[3,2‐b] pyridine
err2009-03-12
err0
PREAI
errL. H. Klemm; Reinhard Zell; I. T. Barnish; R. A. Klemm; C. E. Klopfenstein; D. R. Mccoy
errShare
errSave
In-crystal hyperpolarizabilities ofF−andCl−
err1984-11-15
err0
PREAI
errP. W. Fowler; P. A. Madden
errShare
errSave
researcher View more