.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Improved Gaussian-Bernoulli restricted Boltzmann machine for learning discriminative representations
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.knosys.2019.104911.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) have received considerable research interest in recent years because of their capability to discover latent representations in an unsupervised manner. The standard RBM is only suitable for processing binary-valued data. To address this limitation, the Gaussian-Bernoulli RBM (GRBM) has been designed to model real-valued data, particularly images. A GRBM that seeks to map real-valued data nonlinearly into a latent representation space is typically trained by contrastive divergence learning. However, most existing GRBM-based models neglect the inherent interpoint affinity information from the original data that can be used to enhance the expression ability of the model. In this study, a novel interpoint-affinity-based GRBM (abGRBM) is proposed to learn discriminative representations in the hidden layer. By incorporating the interpoint affinity information into the training process of the GRBM, the proposed model can not only utilize the GRBM's powerful latent representation learning capabilities for real-valued data, it can also transform the original data into another space with improved separability. We prove the availability of our model using several image datasets of Microsoft Research Asia Multimedia for unsupervised clustering and supervised classification tasks. The experimental results show the superior performance of the GRBM in discovering discriminative representations and demonstrate the effectiveness of the affinity information. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Representation learning
Gaussian-Bernoulli Restricted Boltzmann Machine (GRBM)
Affinity matrix
CD learning
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
K
IF:
7.6
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
4.5W