arrow
Return

Improved Lower Bounds for Graph Edit Distance

delete2018-03-01
delete22
PRE
AI
D
David B. Blumenthal *
J
Johann Gamper
DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2017.2772243delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The problem of deriving lower and upper bounds for the edit distance between undirected, labeled graphs has recently received increasing attention. However, only one algorithm has been proposed that allegedly computes not only an upper but also a lower bound for non-uniform edit costs and incorporates information about both node and edge labels. In this paper, we demonstrate that this algorithm is incorrect. We present a corrected version BRANCH that runs in O(n(2)Delta(3) + n(3)) time, where Delta is the maximum of the maximum degrees of input graphs G and H. We also develop a speed-up BRANCHFAST that runs in O(n(2)Delta(3) + n(3)) time and computes an only slightly less accurate lower bound. The lower bounds produced by BRANCH and BRANCHFAST are shown to be pseudo-metrics on a collection of graphs. Finally, we suggest an anytime algorithm BRANCHTIGHT that iteratively improves BRANCH's lower bound. BRANCHTIGHT runs in O(n(3)Delta(2) + I (n(2)Delta(3) + n(3)) time, where the number of iterations I is controlled by the user. A detailed experimental evaluation shows that all suggested algorithms are Pareto optimal, that they are very effective when used as filters for edit distance range queries, and that they perform excellently when used within classification frameworks.
Keywords:
Graph edit distance
lower bounds
anytime algorithm
graph databases
graph matching
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering cover
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
IF:
10.4
Papers:
6.8K
Citations:
3.2W

Organization

F
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Scholars:
2.8K
Papers: 2.6K
Citations: 6