arrow
Return

Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing

delete2019-01-01
delete61
PRE
AI
R
Ran Li
H
Haixia Li
D
Dan Peng
B
Bo Hao
Z
Zhiyuan Wang
黄二文 cover
黄二文 (Erwen Huang)
乌日嘎 cover
乌日嘎 (Riga Wu)
孙宏钰 cover
孙宏钰 (Hongyu Sun) *
DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.006delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In the present study, 67 individuals from two families were analyzed to explore the efficacy of the ForenSeq (TM) DNA Signature Prep Kit for pairwise kinship analysis. Six types of pairwise relationships including 81 parent-offspring, 60 full siblings, 48 grandparent-grandchildren, 147 uncle/aunt-nephew/nieces, 97 first cousins and 190 non-relatives were generated from these two families and the corresponding likelihood ratio (LR) was calculated using either sequence-based or length-based STR genotype data (i.e., LRsequence and LRlength). In addition, 10,000 pairs of different relationships were simulated to estimate the system powers of the STRs and SNPs in this panel. The results showed that 54, 9 and 5 additional alleles were observed based on sequence for 27 autosomal STRs, 24 Y-STRs and 7 X-STRs, respectively, compared to those based on length information and 11 novel alleles were identified. Five mutations were found for 58 STRs in 81 parent-offspring but no mutations were observed for SNPs. For 27 autosomal STR loci, the LRs were increased from 9.20, 7.87, 2.01, 2.07, 0.42 for log(10)LR(length) to 11.52, 10.12, 2.61, 2.60, 0.52 for log(10)LR(sequence) for paternity index (PI), full siblings index (FSI), grandparent-grandchild index (GI), uncle/aunt-nephew/niece index (UNI) and first cousins index (FCI), respectively. PI values for 94 SNPs separated more than those of 27 STRs if two individuals were non parent-offspring relatives. For the simulation study, the effectiveness was 1 for the parent-offspring relationship at the thresholds of t(1) = -4 and t(2) = 4 and was 0.9998 for full siblings (t(1) = -2, t(2) = 2). With an error rate of 0.42%, 93.02% of second degree relatives could be identified at the thresholds of t(1) = -1 and t(2) = 1. However, the effectiveness was only 0.4300 for first cousins with a relatively high error rate of 2.68% (t(1) = -1, t(2) = 1). In conclusion, STR typing according to the sequence information is more polymorphic, which increases the discrimination power for kinship testing. Compared to these 27 STR markers, 94 SNP markers in this panel have advantages in paternity testing especially when mutated STRs are involved or when a relative is an alleged parent. This panel is powerful enough to resolve paternity and full sibling testing. Most of the second degree relationships could be identified with low error rate while more markers are still needed for first cousins testing.
Keywords:
Kinship analysis
ForenSeq (TM) DNA signature prep kit
Massively parallel sequencing (MPS)
Short tandem repeat (STR)
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Forensic Science International-Genetics cover
Forensic Science International-Genetics
IF:
3.1
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
5.8K

Organization

S
Sun Yat Sen University
Scholars:
9.9W
Papers: 7.2W
Citations: 95
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Characterization of genetic sequence variation of 58 STR loci in four major population groups
err2016-11-01
err141
PREAI
errNovroski, Nicole M. M.; King, Jonathan L.; Churchill, Jennifer D.; Seah, Lay Hong; Budowle, Bruce
errShare
errSave
Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories
err2017-05-01
err237
errOAAI
errJager, Anne C.; Alvarez, Michelle L.; Davis, Carey P.; Guzman, Ernesto; Han, Yonmee; Way, Lisa; Walichiewicz, Paulina; Silva, David; Nguyen Pham; Caves, Glorianna; Bruand, Jocelyne; Schlesinger, Felix; Pond, Stephanie J. K.; Varlaro, Joe; Stephens, Kathryn M.; Holt, Cydne L.
errShare
errSave
Population and performance analyses of four major populations with Illumina's FGx Forensic Genomics System
err2017-09-01
err74
PREAI
errChurchill, Jennifer D.; Novroski, Nicole M. M.; King, Jonathan L.; Seah, Lay Hong; Budowle, Bruce
errShare
errSave
Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: Considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements
err2016-05-01
err197
errOAAI
errParson, Walther; Ballard, David; Budowle, Bruce; Butler, John M.; Gettings, Katherine B.; Gill, Peter; Gusmao, Leonor; Hares, Douglas R.; Irwin, Jodi A.; King, Jonathan L.; de Knijff, Peter; Morling, Niels; Prinz, Mechthild; Schneider, Peter M.; Van Neste, Christophe; Willuweit, Sascha; Phillips, Christopher
errShare
errSave
Performance of the ForenSeqTM DNA Signature Prep kit on highly degraded samples
err2017-02-09
err60
errOAAI
errFattorini, Paolo; Previdere, Carlo; Carboni, Ilaria; Marrubini, Giorgio; Sorcaburu-Cigliero, Solange; Grignani, Pierangela; Bertoglio, Barbara; Vatta, Paolo; Ricci, Ugo
errShare
errSave
Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci
err2017-07-01
err18
PREAI
errCho, Sohee; Shin, Eun Soon; Yu, Hyung Jin; Lee, Ji Hyun; Seo, Hee Jin; Kim, Moon Young; Lee, Soong Deok
errShare
errSave
Applying massively parallel sequencing to paternity testing on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine
err2017-11-01
err19
PREAI
errLi, Hui; Zhao, Xueying; Ma, Ke; Cao, Yu; Zhou, Huaigu; Ping, Yuan; Shao, Chengchen; Xie, Jianhui; Liu, Wenbin
errShare
errSave
Developmental validation of the GlobalFiler® Express PCR Amplification Kit: A 6-dye multiplex assay for the direct amplification of reference samples
err2015-11-01
err85
PREAI
errWang, Dennis Y.; Gopinath, Siddhita; Lagace, Robert E.; Norona, Wilma; Hennessy, Lori K.; Short, Marc L.; Mulero, Julio J.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more