arrow
Return

Improving EEG-Based Driver Distraction Classification Using Brain Connectivity Estimators

delete2022-08-19
delete15
delete
OA
AI
D
Dulan Perera
Y
Yu–Kai Wang
C
Chin‐Teng Lin
H
Hung T. Nguyen
R
Rifai Chai *
DOI:10.3390/s22166230delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This paper discusses a novel approach to an EEG (electroencephalogram)-based driver distraction classification by using brain connectivity estimators as features. Ten healthy volunteers with more than one year of driving experience and an average age of 24.3 participated in a virtual reality environment with two conditions, a simple math problem-solving task and a lane-keeping task to mimic the distracted driving task and a non-distracted driving task, respectively. Independent component analysis (ICA) was conducted on the selected epochs of six selected components relevant to the frontal, central, parietal, occipital, left motor, and right motor areas. Granger-Geweke causality (GGC), directed transfer function (DTF), partial directed coherence (PDC), and generalized partial directed coherence (GPDC) brain connectivity estimators were used to calculate the connectivity matrixes. These connectivity matrixes were used as features to train the support vector machine (SVM) with the radial basis function (RBF) and classify the distracted and non-distracted driving tasks. GGC, DTF, PDC, and GPDC connectivity estimators yielded the classification accuracies of 82.27%, 70.02%, 86.19%, and 80.95%, respectively. Further analysis of the PDC connectivity estimator was conducted to determine the best window to differentiate between the distracted and non-distracted driving tasks. This study suggests that the PDC connectivity estimator can yield better classification accuracy for driver distractions.
Keywords:
distracted driving
brain connectivity
GGC
DTF
PDC
GPDC
driver distraction classification
PSD
SVM
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Sensors cover
Sensors
IF:
3.5
Papers:
7.2W
Citations:
20.9W

Organization

S
Swinburne University of Technology
Scholars:
9.3K
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 2.0W
U
university of technology sydney
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 25
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Conductivity and Thermal-Stability of 5-Sulfosalicylic Acid Sodium Doped Polypyrrole
err2010-01-01
err0
PREAI
errFu Fang Zhou; Bao Gai Zhai; Chun Xu Pan; Yuan Ming Huang
errShare
errSave
Low-Gravity Sensing of Liquid/Vapor Interface and Transient Liquid Flow
err1987-03-01
err0
PREAI
errS.A. Jacobson; J.M. Korba; L.C. Lynnworth; T.H. Nguyen; G.F. Orton; A.J. Orazietti
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Physical Activity Change during COVID-19 Confinement
err2020-09-21
err0
errOAAI
errArkaitz Castañeda-Babarro; Ane Arbillaga-Etxarri; Borja Gutiérrez-Santamaría; Aitor Coca
errShare
errSave
Driver Distraction Detection Methods: A Literature Review and Framework
err2021-01-01
err95
errOAAI
errKashevnik, Alexey; Shchedrin, Roman; Kaiser, Christian; Stocker, Alexander
errShare
errSave
Electroencephalographic Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Simulated Driving With Varying Modality-Specific Attentional Demand
err2019-12-01
err8
PREAI
errGonzalez-Trejo, Ernesto; Mogele, Hannes; Pfleger, Norbert; Hannemann, Ronny; Strauss, Daniel J.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more