arrow
Return

Improving forecasts using equally weighted predictors

delete2015-08-01
delete38
PRE
AI
A
Andreas Graefe *
DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.038delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The usual procedure for developing linear models to predict any kind of target variable is to identify a subset of most important predictors and to estimate weights that provide the best possible solution for a given sample. The resulting optimally weighted linear composite is then used when predicting new data. This approach is useful in situations with large and reliable datasets and few predictor variables. However, a large body of analytical and empirical evidence since the 1970s shows that such optimal variable weights are of little, if any, value in situations with small and noisy datasets and a large number of predictor variables. In such situations, which are common for social science problems, including all relevant variables is more important than their weighting. These findings have yet to impact many fields. This study uses data from nine U.S. election-forecasting models whose vote-share forecasts are regularly published in academic journals to demonstrate the value of (a) weighting all predictors equally and (b) including all relevant variables in the model. Across the ten elections from 1976 to 2012, equally weighted predictors yielded a lower forecast error than regression weights for six of the nine models. On average,,the error of the equal-weights models was 5% lower than the error of the original regression models. An equal-weights model that uses all 27 variables that are included in the nine models missed the final vote-share results of the ten elections on average by only 1.3 percentage points. This error is 48% lower than the error of the typical, and 29% lower than the error of the most accurate, regression model. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Equal weights
Index method
Econometric models
Presidential election forecasting
Differential weights
Regression
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Business Research cover
Journal of Business Research
IF:
9.8
Papers:
1.0W
Citations:
8.7W

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Optimal gain‐scheduling control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell: An LMI approach
err2021-11-26
err0
PREAI
errAmir Afsharinejad; Mohammad Hassan Asemani; Maryam Dehghani; Roozbeh Abolpour; Navid Vafamand
errShare
errSave
<title>Incoherent x-ray mirror surface metrology</title>
err1997-11-01
err0
PREAI
errOlivier Hignette; Andreas K. Freund; Elia Chinchio
errShare
errSave
Combining forecasts: An application to elections
err2014-01-01
err122
PREAI
errGraefe, Andreas; Armstrong, J. Scott; Jones, Randall J., Jr.; Cuzan, Alfred G.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more