.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Improving Implicit Recommender Systems with Auxiliary Data
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1145/3372338.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Most existing recommender systems leverage the primary feedback only, despite the fact that users also generate a large amount of auxiliary feedback. These feedback usually indicate different user preferences when comparing to the primary feedback directly used to optimize the system performance. For example, in E-commerce sites, view data is easily accessible, which provides a valuable yet weaker signal than the primary feedback of purchase. In this work, we improve implicit feedback-based recommender systems (dubbed Implicit Recommender Systems) by integrating auxiliary view data into matrix factorization (MF). To exploit different preference levels, we propose both pointwise and pairwise models in terms of how to leverage users' viewing behaviors. The latter model learns the pairwise ranking relations among purchased, viewed, and non-viewed interactions, being more effective and flexible than the former pointwise MF method. However, such a pairwise formulation poses a computational efficiency problem in learning the model. To address this problem, we design a new learning algorithm based on the element-wise Alternating Least Squares (eALS) learner. Notably, our designed algorithm can efficiently learn model parameters from the whole user-item matrix (including all missing data), with a rather low time complexity that is dependent on the observed data only. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms several state-of-the-art MF methods by 6.43%similar to 6.75%. Our implementation is available at littps://gitliub.com/dingjingtao/Auxiliary_enlianced_ALS.
Keywords:
Auxiliary feedback
eALS
implicit feedback
item recommendation
matrix factorization
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
9.1
Papers:
1.2K
Citations:
4.7K
Organization
View more organizations