.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
In-store behavioral analytics technology selection using fuzzy decision making
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1108/JEIM-02-2018-0035.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Purpose With the emerging technologies, collecting and processing data about the behaviors of customers or employees in a specific location has become possible. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate existing data collection technologies. Design/methodology/approach Technology evaluation problem is handled as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In this manner, a decision model containing four criteria and eight sub-criteria and four alternatives are formed. The problem is solved using hesitant analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFN). Findings The results show that the most important sub-criteria are: accuracy, quantity, ntrospective and cost. Decision makers' evaluate for alternatives, namely wireless fidelity (WiFi), camera, radio-frequency identification and Bluetooth. The best alternative is found as Bluetooth which is followed by WiFi and Camera. Research limitations/implications Technology evaluation problem, just like many other MCDM problems are solved using expert evaluations. Thus, the generalizability of the findings is low. Originality/value In this paper, technology selection problem has been handled using hesitant AHP for the first time. In addition, the original methodology is extended by using TrFN to represent the expert evaluations in a better way.
Keywords:
Analytic hierarchy process
Behavioural analytics
Hesitant fuzzy sets
Technology selection
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.4
Papers:
681
Citations:
4.4K