arrow
Return

International Expert Consensus Recommendations for HER2 Reporting in Breast Cancer: Focus on HER2-low and Ultralow Categories

delete2025-10-28
delete0
delete
OA
AI
E
Emad A. Rakha *
P
Puay Hoon Tan
M
Mieke Van Bockstal
K
Kimberly H. Allison
E
Edi Brogi
G
Grace Callagy
G
Gábor Cserni
S
Shabnam Jaffer
M
Maria Pia Foschini
H
Helenice Gobbi
J
Janina Kulka
X
Xiaoxian Li
E
Elena Provenzano
A
Abeer M. Shaaban
G
Gary M. Tse
Z
Zsuzsanna Varga
A
Anne Vincent-Salomon
R
Rin Yamaguchi
W
Wentao Yang
S
Soha El Sheikh
R
Rohit Bhargava
M
Marina De Brot
R
Rita Canas‐Marques
C
Caterina Marchiò
M
Madhuri Warren
Y
Yasmeen Mir
R
Rahul Deb
H
Hannah Y. Wen
I
Ian O. Ellis
S
Stuart J. Schnitt
S
Sarah E. Pinder
W
Wendy A. Raymond
C
Cecily Quinn
DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100925delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The concept of “HER2-negative” breast cancer is evolving, with the recognition of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow subsets. These subsets are clinically relevant regarding treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), which has shown survival benefit in patients with metastatic carcinoma with minimal HER2 protein expression that lack HER2 gene amplification by in situ hybridisation (ISH). In clinical trials using T-DXd, HER2-low was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ or IHC score 2+ without HER2 gene amplification. HER2-ultralow was defined as faint or barely perceptible, incomplete membrane staining in >0 to ≤10% of tumour cells (IHC score 0+/with membrane staining) and HER2-null as complete absence of staining (IHC score 0/absent membrane staining). These results now necessitate more detailed evaluation and reporting of traditional “HER2-negative” results to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who may benefit from T-DXd therapy. Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have extended regulatory approval of T-DXd to patients with metastatic breast cancer showing HER2-low or HER2-ultralow expression. Updated clinical management guidelines now, therefore, incorporate the spectrum of HER2 results into treatment selection algorithms in the metastatic setting. To align histopathologic practice with these developments, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) has issued a new biomarker-reporting template that recommends explicit distinction between IHC 0/absent membrane staining and IHC 0+/with membrane staining. Key concerns among pathologists include assay variability, scoring reproducibility and quality assurance standards for accurately detecting such low levels of HER2 expression. This manuscript provides expert consensus, evidence-based practical recommendations for identifying and reporting tumours with HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression. We emphasise standardised testing protocols, validated assays, robust internal and external controls, and focused training for pathologists. A universal structured pathology report is proposed to highlight the accurate distinction between IHC 0 (null), IHC 0+ (ultralow), and HER2-low expression.
Keywords:
breast cancer
HER2 classification
Low
Ultralow
reporting guidelines
immunohistochemistry
protein expression
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Modern Pathology cover
Modern Pathology
IF:
5.5
Papers:
5.2K
Citations:
1.8W

Organization

F
Flinders University and Clinpath Pathology
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
B
Bellaria Hospital
Scholars:
9
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
F
Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro
Scholars:
22
Papers: 5
Citations: 0
Q
queen mary university of london
Scholars:
1.8K
Papers: 1.1K
Citations: 0
U
universidade de lisboa
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 29
U
University of Birmingham
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 5.0W
P
pathology
Scholars:
2.3K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 4
S
Stanford Medicine
Scholars:
2.1K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 8.1K
L
liverpool university hospitals nhs foundation trust
Scholars:
126
Papers: 59
Citations: 1
E
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
Scholars:
2.8K
Papers: 2.0K
Citations: 5.2K
R
royal square medical centre
Scholars:
2
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
F
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Scholars:
714
Papers: 186
Citations: 9.9K
I
Institute of Women's Cancer
Scholars:
3
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
U
University of Turin
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 2.8W
Citations: 3.2W
U
university college
Scholars:
81
Papers: 70
Citations: 0
B
bács-kiskun county teaching hospital
Scholars:
3
Papers: 3
Citations: 0
N
northwell health lenox hill hospital
Scholars:
2
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
B
Budapest and Eurofins Medserv Ltd.
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital
Scholars:
8
Papers: 6
Citations: 0
U
University of Nottingham
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 5.5W
B
brigham cancer center
Scholars:
3
Papers: 3
Citations: 0
C
camargo cancer center - 211 prof
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
H
hksar
Scholars:
33
Papers: 9
Citations: 0
U
University Hospital Zurich
Scholars:
646
Papers: 225
Citations: 2
E
Emory University
Scholars:
5.0W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 5.7W
M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 4.6W
Royal Derby Hospital cover
Royal Derby Hospital
Scholars:
41
Papers: 18
Citations: 693
C
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 3.3K
Citations: 7
U
university of galway
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 717
Citations: 1
N
Nagasaki University Hospital
Scholars:
101
Papers: 47
Citations: 426
researcher View more organizations