.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE AND INEQUALITY
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1086/261941.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The permanent income hypothesis implies that, for any cohort of people born at the same time, inequality in both consumption and income should grow with age. We investigate this prediction using cohort data constructed from 11 years of household survey data from the United States, 22 years from Great Britain, and 14 years from Taiwan. The data show that within-cohort consumption and income inequality measures do indeed increase with age in the three economies and that the rate of increase is similar in all three. According to the permanent income hypothesis, the increase in inequality reflects cumulative differences in the effects of luck on consumption. Other models of intertemporal choice-such as those with strong precautionary motives or liquidity constraints-can limit or even prevent the spread of inequality, as can insurance arrangements that share risk across individuals. The evidence on the spread of inequality can therefore be used to help quantify the extent to which private and social arrangements moderate the impact of risk on the distribution of individual welfare.
Keywords:
PERMANENT INCOME HYPOTHESIS
EARNINGS INEQUALITY
UNITED-STATES
INFORMATION
CONSUMPTION
EQUILIBRIUM
AGGREGATION
GROWTH
TRENDS
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.3
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
3.2W
Organization
No organization information available