Interventional EUS (with videos)

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.021

Interventional EUS (with videos)

2017-03-01

21

PRE

AI

Udayakumar Navaneethan

DOI：10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.021

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the related articles feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking. In such cases large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through February 2016 for relevant articles by using key words such as endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasonography, and EUS, combined with other relevant terms such as therapeutic, interventional, and adverse events, among others. Articles reporting on specific procedures such as pseudocyst drainage, biliary/pancreatic drainage, celiac plexus neurolysis, and gastric variceal therapy, among others, were also searched for individually with appropriate relevant terms. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Keywords:

CELIAC PLEXUS NEUROLYSIS

GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE

UNRESECTABLE PANCREATIC-CANCER

ENDOSCOPIC TRANSMURAL DRAINAGE

PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL

GASTRIC FUNDAL VARICES

FLUID COLLECTIONS

FAILED ERCP

PSEUDOCYST DRAINAGE

ETHANOL-LAVAGE

Interventional EUS (with videos)

Abstract

AI Summary

Journal

Organization