.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Iterative model-based optimal experimental design for mixture-process variable models to predict solubility
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.cherd.2022.12.006.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Crystallization process design relies heavily on predictive solubility models. However, their calibration is resource-and labour-intensive, especially for multicomponent solvent mixtures at different process temperatures. Additionally, solubility data collection often occurs in a constrained design space due to e.g., polymorphism and solvent miscibility limitations. Optimal experimental design techniques enable the efficient use of resources by specifying a (minimum) number of maximally informative experiments focused on improving a statistical criterion for a given model structure in a constrained design space. This work generates D-, A-and I-optimal experimental designs for the commonly applied Van't-Hoff Jouyban-Acree (VH-JA) solubility regression model, in which it is demonstrated that I-optimal designs reduce the experimental burden for model calibration by ap-proximately 25 % as compared to a typical screening dataset. Alternatively, existing da-tasets can be augmented to significantly improve model prediction power. The suggested workflow is applied to two case studies: itraconazole in tetrahydrofuran-water and me-salazine in ethanol-polyethylene glycol-water. The screening datasets of 72 and 212 runs were augmented with 16 additional experiments, resulting in a 33 % and 67 % reduction in the corresponding model prediction variance, respectively, which translates to improved model reliability at unprobed conditions.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Solubility
Crystallization
Optimal experimental design
Parameter estimation
Jouyban-Acree model
Equilibrium thermodynamics
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.9
Papers:
9.0K
Citations:
2.1W