.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
KSIQA: A Knowledge-Sharing Model for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
H
J
H
J
W
Y
R
W
H
DOI：10.1109/tnnls.2026.3656757.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
No-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) aims to quantitatively measure human perception of visual quality without comparing a distorted image to a reference. Despite recent advances, existing NR-IQR approaches often demonstrate insufficient ability to capture perceptual cues in the absence of a reference, limiting their generalisability across diverse and complex real-world image degradations. These limitations hinder their ability to match the reliability of full-reference IQA (FR-IQA) counterparts. A key challenge, therefore, is to enable NR-IQA models to emulate the reference-aware reasoning exhibited by humans and FR-IQA methods. To address this challenge, we propose a novel NR-IQA model based on a knowledge-sharing (KS) strategy to simulate this capability and predict image quality more effectively. Specifically, we designate an FR-IQA model as the teacher and an NR-IQA model as the student. Unlike conventional knowledge distillation (KD), our proposed architecture enables the NR-IQA student and FR-IQA teacher to share a decoder rather than being independent models. Furthermore, the student model contains a Mental Imagery Generation (MIG) module to learn mental imagery as the reference. To fully exploit local and global information, we adopt a vision transformer (ViT) branch and a convolutional neural network branch for feature extraction (FE). Finally, a quality-aware regressor (QAR) combined with deep ordinal regression is constructed to infer the quality score. Experiments show that our proposed NR-IQA model, KSIQA, has class-leading performance against current no-reference (NR) techniques across widespread benchmark datasets.
Keywords:
Image quality
objective metric
perception
subjective experiment
Journal
IF:
8.9
Papers:
7.5K
Citations:
7.2W
Organization
Cited Papers