arrow
Return

Large language models encode clinical knowledge

delete2023-07-12
delete0
delete
OA
AI
K
Karan Singhal *
S
Shekoofeh Azizi *
T
Tao Tu
S
S. Sara Mahdavi
J
Jason Wei
H
Hyung Won Chung
N
Nathan Scales
A
Ajay Tanwani
H
Heather Cole-Lewis
S
Stephen Pfohl
P
Perry Payne
M
Martin Seneviratne
P
Paul Gamble
C
Chris Kelly
A
Abubakr Babiker
N
Nathanael Schärli
A
Aakanksha Chowdhery
P
P. Mansfield
D
Dina Demner-Fushman
B
Blaise Agüera y Arcas
D
Dale R. Webster
G
Greg S. Corrado
Y
Yossi Matias
K
Katherine Chou
J
Juraj Gottweis
N
Nenad Tomašev
Y
Yun Liu
A
Alvin Rajkomar
J
Joelle Barral
C
Christopher Semturs
A
Alan Karthikesalingam *
V
Vivek Natarajan *
DOI:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities, but the bar for clinical applications is high. Attempts to assess the clinical knowledge of models typically rely on automated evaluations based on limited benchmarks. Here, to address these limitations, we present MultiMedQA, a benchmark combining six existing medical question answering datasets spanning professional medicine, research and consumer queries and a new dataset of medical questions searched online, HealthSearchQA. We propose a human evaluation framework for model answers along multiple axes including factuality, comprehension, reasoning, possible harm and bias. In addition, we evaluate Pathways Language Model1 (PaLM, a 540-billion parameter LLM) and its instruction-tuned variant, Flan-PaLM2 on MultiMedQA. Using a combination of prompting strategies, Flan-PaLM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on every MultiMedQA multiple-choice dataset (MedQA3, MedMCQA4, PubMedQA5 and Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) clinical topics6), including 67.6% accuracy on MedQA (US Medical Licensing Exam-style questions), surpassing the prior state of the art by more than 17%. However, human evaluation reveals key gaps. To resolve this, we introduce instruction prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient approach for aligning LLMs to new domains using a few exemplars. The resulting model, Med-PaLM, performs encouragingly, but remains inferior to clinicians. We show that comprehension, knowledge recall and reasoning improve with model scale and instruction prompt tuning, suggesting the potential utility of LLMs in medicine. Our human evaluations reveal limitations of today’s models, reinforcing the importance of both evaluation frameworks and method development in creating safe, helpful LLMs for clinical applications. Med-PaLM, a state-of-the-art large language model for medicine, is introduced and evaluated across several medical question answering tasks, demonstrating the promise of these models in this domain.

Journal

Nature cover
Nature
IF:
48.5
Papers:
3.4W
Citations:
98.0W

Organization

G
Google Research
Scholars:
1.0K
Papers: 24
Citations: 0
N
National Library of Medicine
Scholars:
24
Papers: 8
Citations: 0
D
deepmind
Scholars:
343
Papers: 38
Citations: 20
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Measuring Harm in Health Care Optimizing Adverse Event Review
err2017-04-01
err10
errOAAI
errWalsh, Kathleen E.; Harik, Polina; Mazor, Kathleen M.; Perfetto, Deborah; Anatchkova, Milena; Biggins, Colleen; Wagner, Joann; Schoettker, Pamela J.; Firneno, Cassandra; Klugman, Robert; Tjia, Jennifer
errShare
errSave
Use of deep learning to develop continuous-risk models for adverse event prediction from electronic health records
err2021-05-05
err46
errOAAI
errTomasev, Nenad; Harris, Natalie; Baur, Sebastien; Mottram, Anne; Glorot, Xavier; Rae, Jack W.; Zielinski, Michal; Askham, Harry; Saraiva, Andre; Magliulo, Valerio; Meyer, Clemens; Ravuri, Suman; Protsyuk, Ivan; Connell, Alistair; Hughes, Cian O.; Karthikesalingam, Alan; Cornebise, Julien; Montgomery, Hugh; Rees, Geraint; Laing, Chris; Baker, Clifton R.; Osborne, Thomas F.; Reeves, Ruth; Hassabis, Demis; King, Dominic; Suleyman, Mustafa; Back, Trevor; Nielson, Christopher; Seneviratne, Martin G.; Ledsam, Joseph R.; Mohamed, Shakir
errShare
errSave
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
err2018-06-11
err2.9K
errOAAI
errBoateng, Godfred O.; Neilands, Torsten B.; Frongillo, Edward A.; Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.; Young, Sera L.
errShare
errSave
Erratum to: Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
err2017-03-03
err0
errOAAI
errFabiane F. R. Morgado; Juliana F. F. Meireles; Clara M. Neves; Ana C. S. Amaral; Maria E. C. Ferreira
errShare
errSave
Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision
err2021-01-08
err578
errOAAI
errEsteva, Andre; Chou, Katherine; Yeung, Serena; Naik, Nikhil; Madani, Ali; Mottaghi, Ali; Liu, Yun; Topol, Eric; Dean, Jeff; Socher, Richard
errShare
errSave
PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classification
err2022-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errXu Han; Weilin Zhao; Ning Ding; Zhiyuan Liu; Maosong Sun
errShare
errSave
TYDI QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages
err2020-12-01
err205
errOAAI
errClark, Jonathan H.; Choi, Eunsol; Collins, Michael; Garrette, Dan; Kwiatkowski, Tom; Nikolaev, Vitaly; Palomaki, Jennimaria
errShare
errSave
The Reliability of AHRQ Common Format Harm Scales in Rating Patient Safety Events
err2015-03-01
err0
PREAI
errTamara Williams; Marilyn Szekendi; Stephen Pavkovic; Wanda Clevenger; Julie Cerese
errShare
errSave
researcher View more