arrow
Return

Learning dominant physical processes with data-driven balance models

delete2021-02-15
delete49
delete
OA
AI
J
Jared Callaham *
J
James Koch
B
Bingni W. Brunton
J
J. Nathan Kutz
S
Steven L. Brunton
DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-21331-zdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Throughout the history of science, physics-based modeling has relied on judiciously approximating observed dynamics as a balance between a few dominant processes. However, this traditional approach is mathematically cumbersome and only applies in asymptotic regimes where there is a strict separation of scales in the physics. Here, we automate and generalize this approach to non-asymptotic regimes by introducing the idea of an equation space, in which different local balances appear as distinct subspace clusters. Unsupervised learning can then automatically identify regions where groups of terms may be neglected. We show that our data-driven balance models successfully delineate dominant balance physics in a much richer class of systems. In particular, this approach uncovers key mechanistic models in turbulence, combustion, nonlinear optics, geophysical fluids, and neuroscience. The dynamics of complex physical systems can be determined by the balance of a few dominant processes. Callaham et al. propose a machine learning approach for the identification of dominant regimes from experimental or numerical data with examples from turbulence, optics, neuroscience, and combustion.
Keywords:
TURBULENCE
IDENTIFICATION
WAVES
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Nature Communications cover
Nature Communications
IF:
15.7
Papers:
9.2W
Citations:
91.2W

Organization

U
University of Washington
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 7.0W
Citations: 12.5W
U
university of texas austin
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 54
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.5W
Papers: 15.6W
Citations: 210
researcher View more organizations