arrow
Return

Learning from binary labels with instance-dependent noise

delete2018-05-22
delete42
delete
OA
AI
A
Aditya Krishna Menon *
B
Brendan van Rooyen
N
Nagarajan Natarajan
DOI:10.1007/s10994-018-5715-3delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Supervised learning has seen numerous theoretical and practical advances over the last few decades. However, its basic assumption of identical train and test distributions often fails to hold in practice. One important example of this is when the training instances are subject to label noise: that is, where the observed labels do not accurately reflect the underlying ground truth. While the impact of simple noise models has been extensively studied, relatively less attention has been paid to the practically relevant setting of instance-dependent label noise. It is thus unclear whether one can learn, both in theory and in practice, good models from data subject to such noise, with no access to clean labels. We provide a theoretical analysis of this issue, with three contributions. First, we prove that for instance-dependent (but label-independent) noise, any algorithm that is consistent for classification on the noisy distribution is also consistent on the noise-free distribution. Second, we prove that consistency also holds for the area under the ROC curve, assuming the noise scales (in a precise sense) with the inherent difficulty of an instance. Third, we show that the Isotron algorithm can efficiently and provably learn from noisy samples when the noise-free distribution is a generalised linear model. We empirically confirm our theoretical findings, which we hope may stimulate further analysis of this important learning setting.
Keywords:
Label noise
Instance-dependent noise
Consistency
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Machine Learning cover
Machine Learning
IF:
2.9
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
3.4W

Organization

A
Australian National University
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 3.9W
M
Microsoft
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 7