1
Return

Letter by Ansari et al on “Cost-Effectiveness of Physical Therapist Treatment in Addition to Usual Podiatry Management of Plantar Heel Pain: Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Clinical Trial.” McClinton SM, Heiderscheit BC, Flynn TW, Pinto D. Phys Ther. 2025;105:pzaf119. https://doi.org/10.1093/Ptj/pzaf119

delete2026-05-27
delete0
PRE
AI
M
Md Rafe Ansari, BPT
A
Aditi Popli, BPT, MPT *
R
Renu Burathi, BPT
DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzag040delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We read with interest the article by McClinton et al1 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of adding physical therapist treatment to usual podiatry care for plantar heel pain (PHP). The authors should be commended for conducting a long-term economic evaluation alongside a randomized clinical trial and for incorporating both societal and health care sector perspectives. Such analyses are valuable for informing interdisciplinary care decisions.1 Nevertheless, several methodological and statistical considerations warrant clarification to ensure appropriate interpretation of the reported findings.1
Keywords:
Cost-effectiveness
Physical therapist treatment
Plantar heel pain
Economic evaluation
Randomized clinical trial

Journal

Physical Therapy cover
Physical Therapy
IF:
3.3
Papers:
5.0K
Citations:
1.6W

Organization

M
Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be university)
Scholars:
26
Papers: 13
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers