.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Localizability With Range-Difference Measurements: Numerical Computation and Error Bound Analysis
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TNET.2022.3162930.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This paper studies the localization problem using noisy range-difference measurements, or equivalently time difference of arrival (TDOA) measurements. There is a reference sensor, and for each other sensor, the TDOA measurement is obtained with respect to the reference one. By minimizing the sum of squared errors, a nonconvex constrained least squares (CLS) problem is formulated. In this work, we focus on devising an algorithm to seek the global minimizer of the CLS problem, hoping that the numerical solution meets some precision requirement in terms of relative error. Based on the Lagrange multiplier method, we first branch the feasible Lagrange multiplier set into several subsets and develop a workflow in terms of if-then-else control structure to seek the global minimizer by searching for the optimal Lagrange multiplier. The execution order is carefully organized so that it is in line with the general principle of putting the flow that one normally understands to be executed first. We then dive into detailed searching methods in different cases and conduct computational error analysis, giving the error bound on the Lagrange multiplier, when we search for it, to meet the precision requirement on an approximate solution. Based on the above achievements, a programmable global minimizer seeking algorithm is proposed for the CLS problem. Simulations and experimental tests on a public dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Keywords:
Location awareness
Noise measurement
Error analysis
Pollution measurement
Measurement uncertainty
Coordinate measuring machines
Closed-form solutions
Localization
time difference of arrival (TDOA)
nonconvex optimization
numerical computation
Lagrange multiplier
Journal
I
IF:
3.6
Papers:
4.4K
Citations:
9.5K
View more organizations