.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Low-Volume Contrast Medium Protocol for Comprehensive Cardiac and Aortoiliac CT Assessment in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.018.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Rationale and Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic performance of a comprehensive computed tomography (CT) protocol for both cardiac and aortoiliac evaluation of patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a single, low-volume contrast medium (CM) injection. Materials and Methods: Forty-four TAVR candidates were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent retrospectively electrocardiogramgated cardiac CT followed by high-pitch CT angiography of the aortoiliac vasculature using one of two single injection protocols of 320 mgl/mL iodine CM: group A (n = 22), iodine delivery rate-based (1.28 gl/s), 60-mL CM volume, 4.0 mUs flow rate; group B (n = 22), clinical routine protocol, 100-mL CM volume, 4.0 mUs flow rate. Mean arterial attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed. Results: Aortic root and iliofemoral dimensions could be analyzed in all cases. Patient characteristics showed no significant differences. Mean attenuation at the levels of the aortic root (285.8 +/- 83.0 HU vs 327.5 +/- 70.8 HU, P = .080) and the iliofemoral access route (256.8 +/- 88.5 HU vs 307.5 +/- 93.2 HU, P = .071), as well as SNR and CNR were nonsignificantly lower in group A compared to group B. Subjective image quality was equivalent. Conclusions: In multimorbid TAVR patients, the performance of a combined CT protocol using a single low-volume CM bolus is feasible with maintained image quality compared to a standard protocol.
Keywords:
Aortic stenosis
aortoiliac CT angiography
contrast medium
dual-source CT
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.9
Papers:
8.6K
Citations:
1.0W