arrow
Return

LSTM-based argument recommendation for non-API methods

delete2020-08-14
delete11
PRE
AI
G
Guangjie Li
刘辉 cover
刘辉 (Hui Liu) *
G
Ge Li
H
Hanlin Tang
DOI:10.1007/s11432-019-2830-8delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Automatic code completion is one of the most useful features provided by advanced IDEs. Argument recommendation, as a special kind of code completion, is widely used as well. While existing approaches focus on argument recommendation for popular APIs, a large number of non-API invocations are requesting for accurate argument recommendation as well. To this end, we propose an LSTM-based approach to recommending non-API arguments instantly when method calls are typed in. With data collected from a large corpus of open-source applications, we train an LSTM neural network to recommend actual arguments based on identifiers of the invoked method, the corresponding formal parameter, and a list of syntactically correct candidate arguments. To feed these identifiers into the LSTM neural network, we convert them into fixed-length vectors by Paragraph Vector, an unsupervised neural network based learning algorithm. With the resulting LSTM neural network trained on sample applications, for a given call site we can predict which of the candidate arguments is more likely to be the correct one. We evaluate the proposed approach with tenfold validation on 85 open-source C applications. Results suggest that the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in recommending non-API arguments. It improves the precision significantly from 71.46% to 83.37%.
Keywords:
argument recommendation
LSTM
deep learning
non-API
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Science China Information Sciences cover
Science China Information Sciences
IF:
7.6
Papers:
4.9K
Citations:
8.9K

Organization

B
beijing institute of technology
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 63
P
peking university
Scholars:
11.8W
Papers: 8.7W
Citations: 146