arrow
Return

Lymph node segmentation by dynamic programming and active contours

delete2018-04-01
delete7
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yongqiang Tan
L
Lin Lu
A
Apurva Bonde
D
Deling Wang
J
Jing Qi
L
Lawrence H. Schwartz
B
Binsheng Zhao *
DOI:10.1002/mp.12844delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
PurposeEnlarged lymph nodes are indicators of cancer staging, and the change in their size is a reflection of treatment response. Automatic lymph node segmentation is challenging, as the boundary can be unclear and the surrounding structures complex. This work communicates a new three-dimensional algorithm for the segmentation of enlarged lymph nodes. MethodsThe algorithm requires a user to draw a region of interest (ROI) enclosing the lymph node. Rays are cast from the center of the ROI, and the intersections of the rays and the boundary of the lymph node form a triangle mesh. The intersection points are determined by dynamic programming. The triangle mesh initializes an active contour which evolves to low-energy boundary. Three radiologists independently delineated the contours of 54 lesions from 48 patients. Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the algorithm's performance. ResultsThe mean Dice coefficient between computer and the majority vote results was 83.2%. The mean Dice coefficients between the three radiologists' manual segmentations were 84.6%, 86.2%, and 88.3%. ConclusionsThe performance of this segmentation algorithm suggests its potential clinical value for quantifying enlarged lymph nodes.
Keywords:
active contours
computed tomography (CT)
dynamic programming
lymph node segmentation
sphere subdivision
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Medical Physics cover
Medical Physics
IF:
3.2
Papers:
3.7W
Citations:
3.2W

Organization

C
Columbia University
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.4W
Citations: 263
A
alphabet inc.
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 663
Citations: 0
S
Sun Yat Sen University
Scholars:
9.9W
Papers: 7.2W
Citations: 95
O
Oregon Health & Science University
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 39
G
Google Incorporated
Scholars:
3.5K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 8
researcher View more organizations