arrow
Return

Machine Learning-Based Organic Soil Classification Using Cone Penetrometer Tests

delete2024-09-01
delete0
PRE
AI
H
Hanssel Omar Ulloa *
A
Alex Ramirez
N
Navid H. Jafari
S
Sabarethinam Kameshwar
I
Ignacio Harrouch
DOI:10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12322delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Soil classification methods currently rely on soil borings or cone/piezocone penetrometer tests (CPT/CPTu). Literature provides several methods that classify soils based on two parameters (typically tip resistance and friction sleeve/porewater pressure) obtained from CPTu data, defining a soil behavior type. However, these methods face challenges in reliably classifying certain soils, such as organic soils. Robust and complex analyses are required to classify organic soils accurately. In this study, a random forest (RF) based method is developed to predict the presence and depth of organic soils. The RF model utilized features from CPTu soundings including tip resistance, sleeve friction, and pore pressure. The true location of organic soils, derived from index properties obtained from soil borings, served as the model's outputs. Unseen CPTu data was used to predict organic soils throughout the entire project alignment, serving as validation for the model. The model achieved an F1 score of 0.89. Settlement analyses were conducted to evaluate the practical implications of the model's predictions on levee fill costs. The RF-based model yielded settlement predictions that closely matched those obtained through boring predictions. In contrast, traditional classification methods underestimated settlements, resulting in lower estimates for levee fill costs.
Keywords:
Organic soils
Cone penetrometer test (CPT)
Machine learning
Soil classification
Random forest (RF)

Journal

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering cover
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
IF:
4.4
Papers:
5.6K
Citations:
2.3W

Organization

L
louisiana state university system
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 15
L
Louisiana State University
Scholars:
9.8K
Papers: 8.0K
Citations: 1.6W