arrow
Return

Machine-learning-enabled spatial pattern mining: evaluating the impact of imperfect inputs

delete2025-04-21
delete0
PRE
AI
Z
Zhili Li
Y
Yiqun Xie *
X
Xiaowei Jia *
G
Gengchen Mai
Z
Zhihao Wang
W
Weiye Chen
DOI:10.1080/13658816.2025.2490687delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Spatial pattern mining (SPM) aims to detect geographic locations or areas that present interesting, nontrivial, and potentially useful patterns. Traditional formulations of point-based SPM tasks are mainly based on true observations, which tend to have limited spatial coverage, availability, and timeliness. While machine learning (ML) has the potential to extend the range of usable data, the uncertainty of model-predicted labels presents new challenges for their usability in the SPM context. This paper formulates the task of ML-enabled SPM using predicted labels by ML models. Given the ever-expanding family of spatial patterns, we consider four widely-adopted patterns - hotspots, co-locations, mixture patterns, and spatial outliers - to scope our study to make the discussion concrete. We develop soft-label versions of SPM algorithms that can directly execute on uncertain predictions generated by ML models. Additionally, we evaluate the ML-enabled SPM results for both categorical and real-valued datasets across a spectrum of prediction quality. The results show that certain spatial patterns such as multinomial scan statistic-based mixture patterns and normal-model-based hotspots can more robustly maintain the detection quality at different error levels, while others such as spatial outliers are more sensitive to incorrect predictions. This provides helpful guidance on using learning-based predictions for SPM.
Keywords:
Machine learning
pattern mining
imperfect labels
evaluation

Journal

International Journal of Geographical Information Science cover
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
IF:
5.1
Papers:
2.7K
Citations:
9.3K

Organization

U
university of texas at austin
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 646
Citations: 0
U
University of Pittsburgh
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 7.1W
C
College Park
Scholars:
818
Papers: 416
Citations: 5
researcher View more organizations