arrow
Return

Making Messy Data Work for Conservation

delete2020-05-01
delete59
delete
OA
AI
A
Andrew D. M. Dobson *
E
E.J. Milner‐Gulland
N
Nicholas J. Aebischer
C
Colin M. Beale
R
Robert Brozovic
P
Peter Coals
R
Rob Critchlow
A
Anthony Dancer
M
Michelle Greve
A
Amy Hinsley
H
Harriet Ibbett
A
Alison Johnston
T
Timothy Kuiper
S
Steven Le Comber
S
Simon P. Mahood
J
Jennifer F. Moore
E
Erlend B. Nilsen
M
Michael J. O. Pocock
A
Anthony Quinn
H
Henry Travers
P
Paulo Wilfred
J
Joss Wright
A
Aidan Keane
DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.012delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Conservationists increasingly use unstructured observational data, such as citizen science records or ranger patrol observations, to guide decision making. These datasets are often large and relatively cheap to collect, and they have enormous potential. However, the resulting data are generally messy,'' and their use can incur considerable costs, some of which are hidden. We present an overview of the opportunities and limitations associated with messy data by explaining how the preferences, skills, and incentives of data collectors affect the quality of the information they contain and the investment required to unlock their potential. Drawing widely from across the sciences, we break down elements of the observation process in order to highlight likely sources of bias and error while emphasizing the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. We propose a framework for appraising messy data to guide those engaging with these types of dataset and make them work for conservation and broader sustainability applications.
Keywords:
DATA-INTENSIVE SCIENCE
CITIZEN SCIENCE
BIG DATA
IMPROVE
BIAS
INFORMATION
TRADE
BIODIVERSITY
MANAGEMENT
SEIZURES
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

One Earth cover
One Earth
IF:
15.3
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
8.0K

Organization

State University System of Florida cover
State University System of Florida
Scholars:
12.7W
Papers: 10.9W
Citations: 130
U
university of southampton
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 52
B
Bangor University
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 4.6K
Citations: 7.6K
N
Norwegian Institute Nature Research
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 27
Z
Zoological Society of London
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 988
Citations: 2.6K
Q
Queen Mary University London
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 327
Charles Darwin University cover
Charles Darwin University
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 3.7K
Citations: 3.3K
U
university of pretoria
Scholars:
1.2W
Papers: 9.8K
Citations: 6
U
university of york - uk
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 15
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305
U
university of oxford
Scholars:
9.8W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 137
C
Cornell University
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 10.9W
U
University of Edinburgh
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.6W
Citations: 71
researcher View more organizations