arrow
Return

Management of human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-related acneiform rash: A position paper based on the first Europe/USA Delphi consensus process

delete2024-10-26
delete0
delete
OA
AI
Z
Zoé Apalla *
A
Azael Freites‐Martínez
K
Katerina Grafanaki
A
Ariadna Ortiz‐Brugués
N
Nikolaou, V.
D
Davide Fattore
P
Pietro Sollena
S
Sandhya Deverapalli
N
Nicolas Kluger
M
M. Beylot‐Barry
C
Christopher Iriarte
J
Janellen Smith
I
Ian Tattersall
R
Roni P. Dodiuk‐Gad
M
Maxwell Sauder
C
Cristina Carrera
B
Bernice Y. Kwong
M
Melodi Javid Whitley
N
Nicole R. LeBoeuf
R
Romano, P.
M
Michela Starace
M
Mateeva, V.
J
Julia Riganti
J
Jesse Hirner
A
Amit Patel
L
Lukas Kraehenbuehl
M
Meenal Kheterpal
M
Monika Fida
J
Jessica C. Hassel
M
Mario E. Lacouture
S
Sibaud, V.
DOI:10.1111/jdv.20391delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
BackgroundThere is a need for unified guidance in the management of acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) among dermatologists.ObjectiveTo establish unified international guidelines for the management of acneiform rash caused by EGFR inhibitors, based on an experts' Delphi consensus.MethodsThe initiative was led by five members of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force 'Dermatology for Cancer Patients' who developed a questionnaire that was circulated to a group of 32 supportive oncodermatology experts in Europe, Canada, Argentina, the US States and Asia. The questionnaire consisted of 84 statements in total, regarding diagnosis and treatment of EGFRi-induced acneiform rash. Experts responded to an anonymous 5-point Likert scale survey. The coordinators collected the first-round responses that were checked for consensus (>= 75% agreement in positive [agree or strongly agree] or in negative [disagree or strongly disagree] vote). The statements that did not reach strong consensus in the first round were revised, according to experts' feedback, for a second-round survey.ResultsStrong consensus was reached in 75/84 (89.3%) of the statements, whilst moderate consensus was achieved in 6/84 elements. Key points include consideration of low-dose isotretinoin for refractory grade II/III acneiform rash, use of topical steroid-sparing agents like topical pimecrolimus in the maintenance phase and use of doxycycline in either 100 or 200 mg per day as prophylactic treatment. Interestingly, experts did not recommend topical antibiotics, neither for prevention, nor for treatment. Consensus failure in 3/84 objects is mostly related to the lack of robust data on these topics.ConclusionThis consensus offers crucial insights often overlooked by radiotherapists, general practitioners, dermatologists and oncologists, and it is expected to improve the management of oncologic patients treated with EGFRi in different settings and continents.
Keywords:
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
SKIN TREATMENT REGIMEN
DERMATOLOGICAL TOXICITIES
CUTANEOUS TOXICITIES
ORAL MINOCYCLINE
CANCER-PATIENTS
PHASE-II
CETUXIMAB
PANITUMUMAB
IMPACT

Journal

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology cover
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
IF:
8
Papers:
1.3W
Citations:
2.2W

Organization

E
European University of Madrid
Scholars:
1.9K
Papers: 1.6K
Citations: 1
U
university of helsinki
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 51
U
universite de bordeaux
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 37
D
Duke University
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.7W
Citations: 6.5W
C
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 22
T
Tufts Medical Center
Scholars:
6.5K
Papers: 5.7K
Citations: 7.0K
H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.2W
Papers: 21.9W
Citations: 28.7W
I
irccs policlinico gemelli
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 9
D
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 9.6K
Citations: 3.8W
H
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Scholars:
2.2K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 1.1K
N
New York University
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.9W
Citations: 5.8W
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
U
university of barcelona
Scholars:
6.0W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 74
U
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Scholars:
8.0K
Papers: 5.8K
Citations: 1.1W
B
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Scholars:
1.2W
Papers: 9.4K
Citations: 15
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
A
aristotle university of thessaloniki
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 19
U
University of Naples Federico II
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 51
A
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 232
H
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 26
I
idibaps
Scholars:
7.8K
Papers: 5.8K
Citations: 25
University of Nebraska System cover
University of Nebraska System
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 58
U
university of california irvine
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 1.7W
Citations: 55
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.5W
Papers: 11.9W
Citations: 165
researcher View more organizations