arrow
Return

Mapping and comparing climate equity policy practices using RAG LLM-based semantic analysis and recommendation systems

delete2026-07-28
delete0
delete
OA
AI
S
Seung Jun Choi
S
Sangyup Lee *
DOI:10.1007/s43762-026-00279-0delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This study investigates the use of Large Language Models to enhance the policymaking process. We first analyze planning-related job postings to revisit the evolving roles of planners in the era of AI. We then present the Retrieval-Augmented Policy Analysis Framework (RAPAF), implemented using LangChain-native Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipelines with ChatGPT. The framework performs semantic analysis and extracts policy, strategy, and action items related to common themes in climate equity/justice or action plans. Based on these extracted elements and their evaluated presence, we develop a content-based recommendation system to support cross-city policy comparison. The results indicate that, despite growing attention to AI, planning jobs largely retain their traditional domain emphases in transportation, environmental planning, housing, and land use. Communicative responsibilities remain central to planning practice. Climate equity/justice or action plans commonly address transportation, environmental, and energy-related measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and predominantly employ affirmative language. The implementation of our content-based recommendation system demonstrates how planners can efficiently identify cities with similar policy themes, highlighting patterns of cross-jurisdictional semantic similarity. The study concludes by envisioning localized and personalized AI-assisted systems designed to support professional planning judgment within urban governance contexts.
Keywords:
AI
LLM
RAG
LangChain
Recommendation system
Climate equity plan

Journal

Computational Urban Science cover
Computational Urban Science
IF:
3.2
Papers:
146
Citations:
417

Organization

C
College of Information Technology
Scholars:
79
Papers: 40
Citations: 0
C
College of Urban Science
Scholars:
2
Papers: 2
Citations: 0