arrow
Return

Material Fracturing and Failure Simulation Datasets

delete2025-12-13
delete0
delete
OA
AI
R
Ryley Hill *
K
Kai Gao
A
Aleksandra Pachalieva
A
Agnese Marcato
X
Xiaoyu Wang
P
Pascal Grosset
E
Esteban Rougier
Z
Zhou Lei
J
Javier E. Santos
V
Vinamra Agrawal
Q
Qinjun Kang
J
Jeffrey D. Hyman
A
Abigail Hunter
C
Christine Sweeney
N
Nathan DeBardeleben
E
Earl Lawrence
H
Hari Viswanathan
D
Daniel O’Malley
DOI:10.1038/s41597-025-06412-8delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Fracturing is a fundamental physics phenomena with broad relevance across multiple domains, ranging from infrastructure integrity, aerospace durability, reservoir production, and seismic events. We present a diverse dataset of simulated fracture evolution and material failure generated from two numerical solvers: the phase-field method and the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM). These solvers differ in formulation, physical fidelity, and computational efficiency. The dataset includes five materials: PBX, anisotropic shale, tungsten, aluminum, and steel. For each, phase-field simulations span 400,000 cases: 200,000 under uniaxial tension and 200,000 under biaxial tension. The computationally expensive FDEM simulations include 90,000 split evenly among PBX, shale, and tungsten under uniaxial loading. All simulations begin with randomized initial fracture patterns. Each entry includes temporal data capturing fracture propagation dynamics. This comprehensive dataset is designed to support the development of foundational or surrogate machine learning approaches for predicting material failure. While no such models are introduced here, the dataset lays a robust foundation for advancing future research and innovation in these areas.
Keywords:
fracture simulation
material failure
phase-field method
finite-discrete element method
machine learning
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Scientific Data cover
Scientific Data
IF:
6.9
Papers:
3.5K
Citations:
3.8W

Organization

L
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Scholars:
9.6K
Papers: 6.7K
Citations: 1.9W