1
Return

Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross-sectional data with geographical cross mapping cardinality

delete2026-06-16
delete0
delete
OA
AI
W
Wenbo Lyu
S
Shaoqing Dai
Y
Yongze Song *
W
Wufan Zhao
W
Wen Yi
Y
Yumiao Xiao
N
Nan Jia
DOI:10.1080/13658816.2026.2687121delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Spatial cross-sectional data encapsulate rich information on spatial processes, forming a critical foundation for examining causation between variables. Detecting and quantifying such causation is essential for understanding complex natural and human phenomena. Measuring causal strengths from spatial cross sectional data, however, remains challenging, as existing methods often suffer from high false positive rates when quantifying causation. To address this gap, we propose a Geographical Cross Mapping Cardinality (GCMC) model that quantifies causal strength based on the intersectional cardinality of neighborhoods in reconstructed state space, and incorporates the DeLong placement method to evaluate the statistical significance of causal strength estimates. We validate GCMC using a simulated three variable causal benchmark and three representative spatial cross sectional datasets with known causal structures, and further assess its sensitivity to observational noise. Results demonstrate that GCMC effectively captures causation across weak, moderate, and strong coupling regimes while maintaining a low false positive rate and robust performance under noise. As a new extension of empirical dynamic modeling for spatial cross sectional data, GCMC complements existing methods and enables more reliable spatial causal inference.
Keywords:
Causal strength
spatial cross-sectional data
empirical dynamic modeling
intersectional cardinality
geographical cross mapping cardinality

Journal

International Journal of Geographical Information Science cover
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
IF:
5.1
Papers:
2.7K
Citations:
9.3K

Organization

C
curtin university
Scholars:
2.2K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 1
N
Nanjing Agricultural University
Scholars:
6.6K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 3.6W
T
the hong kong polytechnic university
Scholars:
4.0K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 0
W
wuhan university
Scholars:
7.8W
Papers: 5.7W
Citations: 70
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers