arrow
Return

Measuring postmaterialism

delete2014-08-01
delete232
PRE
AI
R
Ronald Inglehart *
P
Paul R. Abramson
DOI:10.2307/2585581delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
claim that the four-item index developed by Inglehart is invalid because respondents' first and second choices are randomly related and that it fails to predict respondents' positions on theoretically relevant social issues. We maintain that they make unwarranted assumptions about how responses to ipsative items should be related and demonstrate that the value indicators m-e powerful predictors. Clarke et al. argue that the trend toward postmaterialism does not result from long-term generational change but simply reflects declining inflation and rising unemployment over the past quarter-century. We show that period effects, particularly inflation, influence observed values. But after controlling for inflation, there is still a :substantial shift toward postmaterialism. Moreover, rising unemployment partly offsets the effect of falling inflation.
Keywords:
FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVES
POLARIZED PRIORITIES
INDUSTRIAL-SOCIETIES
DIMENSIONALITY
CONTEXT
SCALE
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

American Political Science Review cover
American Political Science Review
IF:
5.8
Papers:
8.7K
Citations:
2.1W

Organization

No organization information available